Harris v. Wells

242 So. 3d 1073
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 13, 2017
DocketCASE NO.: 2D17–4600
StatusPublished

This text of 242 So. 3d 1073 (Harris v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Wells, 242 So. 3d 1073 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. See Rogers v. State, 966 So. 2d 490, 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). This denial is without prejudice to Petitioner's right to file a motion for bond reduction. See Good v. Wille, 382 So. 2d 408, 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (citing Stansel v. State, 297 So. 2d 63, 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) ).

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stansel v. State
297 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Good v. Wille
382 So. 2d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Rogers v. State
966 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 So. 3d 1073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-wells-fladistctapp-2017.