Harris v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Harris v. Virginia

225 F. App'x 191

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2007·No. No. 07-6216·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Martin Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. [192]*192§ 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Virginia, No. 2:06-cv-00723-RBS (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 4, 2007; entered Jan. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Martin Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. [192]*192§ 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Virginia, No. 2:06-cv-00723-RBS (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 4, 2007; entered Jan. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Harris v. Virginia, 225 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

225 F. App'x 191 (Harris v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.