Harris v. Vanguard Group, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Harris v. Vanguard Group, Inc.

667 F. App'x 815

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2016·No. No. 16-1113·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leigh Ann Harris appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Harris v. The Vanguard Group, Inc., No. 3:15-cv-00382-MOC-DSC, 2016 WL 110600 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leigh Ann Harris appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Harris v. The Vanguard Group, Inc., No. 3:15-cv-00382-MOC-DSC, 2016 WL 110600 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Harris v. Vanguard Group, Inc., 667 F. App'x 815 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 815 (Harris v. Vanguard Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related