Harris v. Vang

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Joshua Harris, Case No. 24-CV-01791 (JMB/DJF)

Plaintiff,

ORDER v.

Toua Vang, Andrew Nelson,

Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Dulce J. Foster dated September 16, 2024. (Doc. No. 23.) The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (See Doc. No. 23.) Harris did not object to the R&R. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1). In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED; and

2. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: October 31, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court