Harris v. Vanarsdall
This text of 3 Ky. Op. 156 (Harris v. Vanarsdall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
The consolidation of the different motions for quashing the same sale for the same causes was clearly proper.
On the merits there is more difficulty. The record before us presents a crude preparation hardly intelligible with judicial confidence. But it seems to authorize the deduction that the land 'was sold to satisfy three executions, one of which was levied by the jailer in April and afterwards levied in September by the sheriff who made the sale. And, on this most probable status of the case, the sale was illegal and void, because the sheriff bad no authority under the jailer’s levy, and bis own levy was after the return day of that execution, and therefore that levy and the sale [157]*157under it were void, and consequently more land was sold than was necessary.
Wherefore, on this ground, the judgment dismissing the motions was apparently erroneous, and is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Ky. Op. 156, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-vanarsdall-kyctapp-1869.