Harris v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Harris v. United States

215 F.2d 32, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 218

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 17, 1954

DocketNos. 11713, 12036

StatusPublished

This text of 215 F.2d 32 (Harris v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. United States, 215 F.2d 32, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 218 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, tried before a jury, convicted, and sentenced upon a charge of grand larceny. He appealed from the conviction. Later he filed in the District Court a motion for a new trial on the basis of alleged newly discovered evidence. The motion was denied by that court, and he appealed from the denial. The two appeals were consolidated for argument and decision in this court.

We have examined the contentions made in behalf of appellant and the record in respect thereto. We find no error affecting his substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, tried before a jury, convicted, and sentenced upon a charge of grand larceny. He appealed from the conviction. Later he filed in the District Court a motion for a new trial on the basis of alleged newly discovered evidence. The motion was denied by that court, and he appealed from the denial. The two appeals were consolidated for argument and decision in this court.

We have examined the contentions made in behalf of appellant and the record in respect thereto. We find no error affecting his substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 F.2d 32, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-united-states-cadc-1954.