Harris v. Union Elevated Railroad
This text of 28 N.Y.S. 1112 (Harris v. Union Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There are no questions of law that require discussion. The witness James was clearly incompetent to testify as to the change produced in the rental value of Hudson avenue by the construction, of the road. The question of fact as to the amount of depreciation of the rental value by the road was determined favorably to defendant. The evidence would have justified a much larger verdict. We find no errors, and the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 N.Y.S. 1112, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-union-elevated-railroad-nysupct-1894.