Harris v. T.P.I. Restaurants, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Harris v. T.P.I. Restaurants, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission

DecidedJanuary 23, 1995

DocketI.C. No. 121467

StatusPublished

This text of Harris v. T.P.I. Restaurants, Inc. (Harris v. T.P.I. Restaurants, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. T.P.I. Restaurants, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Counsel for defendants moves the Industrial Commission for a continuance in this matter due to the reason that they have not yet received the plaintiff's Form 44 or brief in this case as a result of the transcript not being filed until December. Counsel for plaintiff joins in the motion for a continuance and requests a thirty day extension of time in which to file his Form 44 and brief. The parties make a joint request for a continuance in order that they may have sufficient time to submit their briefs. In addition, the parties feel that the extension of time and the continuance will be productive in that they are discussing a resolution of this matter.

Upon the parties' motion and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the parties' motion for a CONTINUANCE is hereby GRANTED. In addition, counsel for plaintiff's motion for a thirty day extension of time in which to file his brief is hereby GRANTED.

S/ ________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Counsel for defendants moves the Industrial Commission for a continuance in this matter due to the reason that they have not yet received the plaintiff's Form 44 or brief in this case as a result of the transcript not being filed until December. Counsel for plaintiff joins in the motion for a continuance and requests a thirty day extension of time in which to file his Form 44 and brief. The parties make a joint request for a continuance in order that they may have sufficient time to submit their briefs. In addition, the parties feel that the extension of time and the continuance will be productive in that they are discussing a resolution of this matter.

Upon the parties' motion and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the parties' motion for a CONTINUANCE is hereby GRANTED. In addition, counsel for plaintiff's motion for a thirty day extension of time in which to file his brief is hereby GRANTED.

S/ ________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Harris v. T.P.I. Restaurants, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-tpi-restaurants-inc-ncworkcompcom-1995.