Harris v. the Seaboard Oil Co.

120 So. 13, 97 Fla. 211
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., and Gtblin, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. the Seaboard Oil Co., 120 So. 13, 97 Fla. 211 (Fla. 1929).

120 So. 13 (Harris v. the Seaboard Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jolley El. Co. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Mkts.
230 So. 2d 640 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)