Harris v. Tapia
This text of 225 F. App'x 232 (Harris v. Tapia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sheddrick A. Harris, federal prisoner # 12207-076, is serving a 240-month sentence following a jury conviction for conspiring to commit murder in retaliation against a federal informant, threatening to cause and causing bodily injury to a federal informant with the intent to retaliate, and causing bodily injury to the wife of a federal informant with the intent to retaliate. He filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 asserting that the district court had wrongly calculated his base offense level and had used the wrong version of the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court construed the action as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and transferred it to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Harris seeks to appeal the transfer order.
This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). We lack jurisdiction over the district court’s interlocutory transfer order. See Brinar v. Williamson, 245 F.3d 515, 517-18 (5th Cir.2001). Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 F. App'x 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-tapia-ca5-2007.