Harris v. Sutherland

California Supreme Court

Harris v. Sutherland

19 P. 701, 3 Cal. Unrep. 34

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 4, 1888

DocketNo. 12,655

StatusPublished

This text of 19 P. 701 (Harris v. Sutherland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Sutherland, 19 P. 701, 3 Cal. Unrep. 34 (Cal. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

FOOTE, C.

This case turns upon the point as to whether or not the evidence is sufficient to warrant the court below in finding that a certain instrument in writing made by the plaintiff to Sutherland, the defendant, was intended to be a deed, and not a mortgage. The evidence is conflicting, and the finding should be upheld. We advise that the judgment and order be affirmed.

We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Hayne, C.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOOTE, C.

This case turns upon the point as to whether or not the evidence is sufficient to warrant the court below in finding that a certain instrument in writing made by the plaintiff to Sutherland, the defendant, was intended to be a deed, and not a mortgage. The evidence is conflicting, and the finding should be upheld. We advise that the judgment and order be affirmed.

We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Hayne, C.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 P. 701, 3 Cal. Unrep. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-sutherland-cal-1888.