Harris v. Stiles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harris v. Stiles

78 A.D.3d 1053, 910 N.Y.S.2d 919

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 A.D.3d 1053 (Harris v. Stiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Stiles, 78 A.D.3d 1053, 910 N.Y.S.2d 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffmann, J.), dated November 25, 2009, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Fields, S.M.), dated July 21, 2009, inter alia, denying his cross petition for downward modification of his child support obligation, continuing an order of support dated December 3, 2008, directing him to pay child support in the sum of $169.38 per week, and authorizing the entry of a money judgment for arrears in the sum of $1,019.64.

Ordered that the order dated November 25, 2009, is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to meet his burden of establishing a substantial change of circumstances not of his own making, warranting a downward modification of his child support obligation (see Matter of Gedacht v Agulnek, 67 AD3d 1013 [2009]; Matter of Heyward v Goldman, 23 AD3d 468, 469 [2005]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffmann, J.), dated November 25, 2009, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Fields, S.M.), dated July 21, 2009, inter alia, denying his cross petition for downward modification of his child support obligation, continuing an order of support dated December 3, 2008, directing him to pay child support in the sum of $169.38 per week, and authorizing the entry of a money judgment for arrears in the sum of $1,019.64.

Ordered that the order dated November 25, 2009, is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to meet his burden of establishing a substantial change of circumstances not of his own making, warranting a downward modification of his child support obligation (see Matter of Gedacht v Agulnek, 67 AD3d 1013 [2009]; Matter of Heyward v Goldman, 23 AD3d 468, 469 [2005]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.3d 1053, 910 N.Y.S.2d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-stiles-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack