Harris v. Stickelber

55 S.W.3d 858, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1140, 2001 WL 725463
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 2001·No. Nos. WD 57798, WD 57807·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Hampton Place Apartments appeals the trial court’s judgment granting [859]*859Respondent Darcy E. Harris’ Motion for New Trial. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, no error of law appears, and that an opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Stickelber, 55 S.W.3d 858, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1140, 2001 WL 725463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

55 S.W.3d 858 (Harris v. Stickelber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Stickelber v. Nixon
54 S.W.3d 219 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)