Harris v. State

271 S.W. 392, 99 Tex. Crim. 639, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 S.W. 485
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 1925·No. No. 9360.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Victoria County of felony theft, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bill of exceptions. Exceptions were reserved to the court’s charge, but in the absence of statement of facts, their pertinence cannot be determined. The charge of the court and the indictment .appear to be in conformity with the law. No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 271 S.W. 392, 99 Tex. Crim. 639, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 287 (Tex. 1925).

271 S.W. 392 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.