Harris v. State

275 S.W. 1116, 101 Tex. Crim. 477, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 854

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 S.W. 485 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 14, 1925·No. No. 9757.·Published

Opinion

BERRY, Judge.

The appellant was convicted in the district court of Dallas County for the offense of robbery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five years.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts and there being no error shown therein, it is ordered that the judgment be in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BERRY, Judge.

The appellant was convicted in the district court of Dallas County for the offense of robbery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five years.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts and there being no error shown therein, it is ordered that the judgment be in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Harris v. State, 275 S.W. 1116, 101 Tex. Crim. 477, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 854 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

275 S.W. 1116 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.