Harris v. State

1969 OK CR 10, 449 P.2d 934, 1969 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 324
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 8, 1969
DocketNo. A-14878
StatusPublished

This text of 1969 OK CR 10 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. State, 1969 OK CR 10, 449 P.2d 934, 1969 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 324 (Okla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

BUSSEY, Judge:

Jerry Gerome Harris, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by Information in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, with the crime of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor, he waived jury trial, was found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of Twenty-Five ($25.00) Dollars and costs, and serve one year in the County Jail, all of jail time to be suspended save and except Ten (10) days. From this judgment and sentence, he appeals.

This cause was filed on July 30, 1968, and a brief from defendant was due within Twenty (20) days thereafter. None having been filed within the time allowed by law, and the rules of this Court; or any valid extension thereof, this cause was summarily submitted on September 16, 1968, as provided in Rules 6 and 9 of this Court, 22 O.S. c. 18 Appendix, for examination for fundamental error only. See Ashby v. State, Okl.Cr., 406 P.2d 1007, and Fryar v. State, Okl.Cr., 385 P.2d 818.

Since the appeal perfected in the instant case is an appeal by transcript, the [935]*935only question that can be considered by this Court is whether the trial court had jurisdiction of the person, subject matter, and authority to pronounce the judgment and sentence imposed.

From our examination of the record, we are of the opinion that the trial court had jurisdiction of the person, subject matter, and authority under the law to pronounce the judgment and sentence imposed. We are therefore of the opinion that the judgment and sentence appealed from should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashby v. State
1965 OK CR 121 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1965)
Fryar v. State
1963 OK CR 83 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1969 OK CR 10, 449 P.2d 934, 1969 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-oklacrimapp-1969.