Harris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Harris v. State

1930 OK CR 161, 287 P. 1085, 47 Okla. Crim. 101, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 332

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 12, 1930

DocketNo. A-7132.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 161 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. State, 1930 OK CR 161, 287 P. 1085, 47 Okla. Crim. 101, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 332 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Garvin county for selling one pint of corn whisky to one Willie Hays, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

The plaintiff in error questions the sufficiency of the evidence, but a careful examination of the record reveals sufficient competent evidence to> support the verdict of the jury.

The plaintiff in error also contends that the court erred in admitting immaterial evidence. The court will not reverse a case on the ground of the admission of immaterial evidence, unless from an examination of the record it *102 clearly appears the rights of the defendant were prejudiced thereby. Bates v. State, 46 Okla. Cr. 401, 285 Pac. 847.

We find no error sufficient to warrant a reversal of the case, and for the reasons stated the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI