Harris v. State

181 P. 944, 16 Okla. Crim. 688
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 Okla. Crim. 69
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 28, 1919·No. No. A-3116.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the county court of Tulsa county, wherein the defendants, J. M. Harris and Carl Burton, were jointly tried and convicted of the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor; the said Burton being sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 30 days’ imprisonment in the county jail, and the said Harris to pay a fine of $200 and to serve 30 days’ imprisonment in the county jail. This cause has been pending in this court since the 16th day of August, 1917. No brief has been filed and no appearance was made at the date this cause was submitted by counsel representing the defendants to orally argue the same.

Rule 9 of this court provides:

( “When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.”

*689 An examination of the pleadings, instructions, judgment, and sentence fails to disclose any error committed in the trial prejudicial to either defendant. In conformity with Rule 9, supra, the judgment as to each defendant is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 181 P. 944, 16 Okla. Crim. 688 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

181 P. 944 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.