Harris v. State

1911 OK CR 392, 117 P. 1130, 6 Okla. Crim. 625, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 379
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Okla. Crim. 417
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 5, 1911·No. No. A-700.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 17th day of September, 1910, judgment was rendered against appellant in the district, court of Murray county and he was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary at McAlester for the period of two and one-half years for the offense of knowingly having-received stolen property. Under the law in force at the time of this conviction, the appellant was given six months within which to perfect his appeal. See Snyder’s Comp. Laws Okla. 1909, sec. 6948. The appellant did not, however, perfect his appeal until the 6th day of April, 1910. As the time for' perfecting the appeal in this case had expired, this court has never acquired jurisdiction of this casé" and the appeal is therefore dismissed. •. ''

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 1911 OK CR 392, 117 P. 1130, 6 Okla. Crim. 625, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 379 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

1911 OK CR 392 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.