Harris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Harris v. State

1911 OK CR 392, 117 P. 1130, 6 Okla. Crim. 625, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 379

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 5, 1911

DocketNo. A-700.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 392 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. State, 1911 OK CR 392, 117 P. 1130, 6 Okla. Crim. 625, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 379 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 17th day of September, 1910, judgment was rendered against appellant in the district, court of Murray county and he was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary at McAlester for the period of two and one-half years for the offense of knowingly having-received stolen property. Under the law in force at the time of this conviction, the appellant was given six months within which to perfect his appeal. See Snyder’s Comp. Laws Okla. 1909, sec. 6948. The appellant did not, however, perfect his appeal until the 6th day of April, 1910. As the time for' perfecting the appeal in this case had expired, this court has never acquired jurisdiction of this casé" and the appeal is therefore dismissed. •. ''

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 17th day of September, 1910, judgment was rendered against appellant in the district, court of Murray county and he was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary at McAlester for the period of two and one-half years for the offense of knowingly having-received stolen property. Under the law in force at the time of this conviction, the appellant was given six months within which to perfect his appeal. See Snyder’s Comp. Laws Okla. 1909, sec. 6948. The appellant did not, however, perfect his appeal until the 6th day of April, 1910. As the time for' perfecting the appeal in this case had expired, this court has never acquired jurisdiction of this casé" and the appeal is therefore dismissed. •. ''

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 392, 117 P. 1130, 6 Okla. Crim. 625, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.