Harris v. State
488 S.W.3d 209, 2016 WL 2339392, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 437
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 562 S.W.3d 363 →
Opinion
[210]*210 ORDER
• James Harris (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 488 S.W.3d 209, 2016 WL 2339392, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 437 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
488 S.W.3d 209 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.