Harris v. State
161 So. 749
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 Miss. 38 →
Opinion
The instruction complained of presents no reversible error, if error at all.
The questions propounded to one of the witnesses may have violated the proprieties and the rights of the witness, but present no reversible error.
The evidence supports the verdict.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 161 So. 749 (Mich. 1935).
161 So. 749 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.