Harris v. State
85 S.E. 82, 16 Ga. App. 239, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 Ga. App. 710 →
Opinion
There being sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict of guilty, the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the usual general grounds, will not be interfered with. Judgment affirmed. Broyles, J., not presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 85 S.E. 82, 16 Ga. App. 239, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 560 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
85 S.E. 82 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.