Harris v. State

74 S.E. 439, 10 Ga. App. 835, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 720

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Ga. App. 137 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 2, 1912·No. 3720·Published

Opinion

Russell, J.

As to fraudulent intent the evidence is not sufficient to

.authorize conviction. The ease is controlled by the decision of this court in Mulkey v. State, 1 Ga. App. 521 (57 S. E. 1022).

Judgment reversed.

Pottle, J., not presiding.

Accusation of cheating and swindling; from city court of Madison — Judge Anderson.

September 2, 1911. Percy Middlebroolcs, for plaintiff in error. A. O. Poster, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

As to fraudulent intent the evidence is not sufficient to

.authorize conviction. The ease is controlled by the decision of this court in Mulkey v. State, 1 Ga. App. 521 (57 S. E. 1022).

Judgment reversed.

Pottle, J., not presiding.

Accusation of cheating and swindling; from city court of Madison — Judge Anderson.

September 2, 1911. Percy Middlebroolcs, for plaintiff in error. A. O. Poster, solicitor, contra.

Harris v. State, 74 S.E. 439, 10 Ga. App. 835, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 720 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

74 S.E. 439 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

57 S.E. 1022 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)