Harris v. State
Opinion
Nathanial Harris was convicted of murder in the death of Griffin Harper and sentenced to life imprisonment.1 He appeals and we affirm.
1. The facts when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution are sufficient to prove that Harris shot the victim in the head causing his death. After reviewing the record, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found Harris guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
2. Harris contends that the trial court erred by refusing to charge the jury on the lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter despite his timely written request. On the trial of a murder case, if there [493]*493is even slight evidence that the defendant may have committed voluntary manslaughter instead of murder, the jury should be instructed as to both offenses upon the defendant’s request. Henderson v. State, 234 Ga. 827, 832 (218 SE2d 612) (1975). We have reviewed the evidence presented and concluded that there was insufficient evidence to require that the jury be given the requested charge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
435 S.E.2d 671 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.