Harris v. State

51 S.E. 596, 123 Ga. 538, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 530

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 Ga. 114 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 1, 1905·Published

Opinion

Cobb, J.

The only special assignment of error in the motion for a new trial being upon the admission of evidence, and it not appearing from the motion what objection was made thereto at the time the same was offered, the assignment of error can not be considered. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb, J.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, O. J., absent.

Harris v. State, 51 S.E. 596, 123 Ga. 538, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 530 (Ga. 1905).

Pincite

51 S.E. 596 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.