Harris v. State
156 So. 3d 504, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17245, 2014 WL 5358404
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20661 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Gibbs v. Cochran, 142 So.2d 276, 278 (Fla.1962) (holding that the jurisdiction of the parole commission is not disturbed when the infraction giving rise to revocation was committed during the parole period, but actual revocation occurred after the period had run); Harris v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 654 So.2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (table) (per curiam affirming Appellant’s earlier identical jurisdictional challenge).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 156 So. 3d 504, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17245, 2014 WL 5358404 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
156 So. 3d 504 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibbs v. Cochran
142 So. 2d 276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)