Harris v. State

65 So. 3d 143, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10648, 2011 WL 2650869
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 2011·No. 5D10-316·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas J. Harris, Jr., II, appeals his judgment and sentences for first degree murder and attempted robbery with a firearm, raising five issues. We find no reversible error and affirm. We do agree that the testimony of Deshay Jackson concerning the reason he refused to testify at the first trial should not have been admitted, but allowing the jury to hear the question and Deshay Jackson’s answer, as limited by the trial court, was harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1139 (Fla.1986).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 65 So. 3d 143, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10648, 2011 WL 2650869 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

65 So. 3d 143 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas Harris v. State
192 So. 3d 685 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)