Harris v. State

74 So. 3d 1099, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15235, 2011 WL 4445982
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 2011·No. 1D10-2458·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the lower court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm all but the first issue, and reverse and remand with directions to reinstate the 766 days of jail credit for time served on Counts IV and V that were improperly rescinded from defendant’s initial judgment and sentence. See Davis v. State, 63 So.3d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Session v. State, 37 So.3d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Palmer v. State, 22 So.3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Canete v. Dep’t of Corrs., 967 So.2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Wheeler v. State, 880 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 74 So. 3d 1099, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15235, 2011 WL 4445982 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

74 So. 3d 1099 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richard Alfred Washington v. State of Florida
199 So. 3d 1110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)