Harris v. State
49 So. 3d 865, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19451, 2010 WL 5174347
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 974 So. 2d 1076 →
Opinion
We summarily affirm the circuit court’s denial of Harris’s rule 3.800(a) motion to [866]*866correct an illegal sentence and motion for rehearing, which the court construed to be a rule 3.850 motion. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. We caution Harris that the filing of successive or otherwise procedurally barred claims will result in proceedings to determine appropriate sanctions. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 49 So. 3d 865, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19451, 2010 WL 5174347 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
49 So. 3d 865 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)