Harris v. State
426 So. 2d 1111, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 414 So. 2d 557 →
Opinion
The State agrees with appellant that he cannot be sentenced for the crime of grand theft. We, therefore, strike the sentencing order for this crime. Appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed in all other aspects.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 426 So. 2d 1111, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20691 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
426 So. 2d 1111 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.