Harris v. State

266 So. 2d 395, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6323
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 So. 2d 670
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 1972·No. No. 72-148·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of [396]*396the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 266 So. 2d 395, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6323 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

266 So. 2d 395 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)