Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Harris v. State

620 So. 2d 153, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 253, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 674, 1993 WL 113516

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 15, 1993

DocketNo. 80666

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 620 So. 2d 153 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. State, 620 So. 2d 153, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 253, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 674, 1993 WL 113516 (Fla. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OVERTON, Judge.

We have for review Harris v. State, 608 So.2d 847 (Fla.3d DCA 1992), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993).¹ In accordance with our decision in Johnson, we quash in part, the decision of the district court in the instant case. Nevertheless, we approve Harris’s sentence. The record in this case reflects that none of the amendments to section 775.084, Florida Statutes, contained in chapter 89-280 affected Harris’s sentence. Consequently, we approve the result of the district court’s decision because Harris’s sentence is not altered by our decision in Johnson.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OVERTON, Judge.

We have for review Harris v. State, 608 So.2d 847 (Fla.3d DCA 1992), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993).¹ In accordance with our decision in Johnson, we quash in part, the decision of the district court in the instant case. Nevertheless, we approve Harris’s sentence. The record in this case reflects that none of the amendments to section 775.084, Florida Statutes, contained in chapter 89-280 affected Harris’s sentence. Consequently, we approve the result of the district court’s decision because Harris’s sentence is not altered by our decision in Johnson.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

620 So. 2d 153, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 253, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 674, 1993 WL 113516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-fla-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack