Harris v. State

362 So. 2d 1346, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4915
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 1978
DocketNo. 52617
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 So. 2d 1346 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. State, 362 So. 2d 1346, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4915 (Fla. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari [349 So.2d 854] reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, SUNDBERG and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. ADKINS and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Santa Fe Development Corp. v. Randolph
506 So. 2d 18 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
362 So. 2d 1346, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-fla-1978.