Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Harris v. State

362 So. 2d 1346, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4915

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 21, 1978·No. No. 52617·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari [349 So.2d 854] reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, SUNDBERG and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. ADKINS and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari [349 So.2d 854] reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, SUNDBERG and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. ADKINS and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.

Harris v. State, 362 So. 2d 1346, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4915 (Fla. 1978).

Pincite

362 So. 2d 1346 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related