Harris v. State

139 So. 119, 24 Ala. App. 580, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 10
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 1932·No. 2 Div. 488.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was indicted under two counts. The first count charged him with making, manufacturing, or distilling alcoholic or spirituous liquors, etc.; and the second count with the possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose. There was a general verdict of guilt, and judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered. The court imposed an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary as the law provides. From said judgment this appeal was taken and is here submitted upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the motion for a new trial cannot be considered.

No error appears on the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 139 So. 119, 24 Ala. App. 580, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 10 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

139 So. 119 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
165 So. 833 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)