Harris v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Harris v. State

139 So. 119, 24 Ala. App. 580, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 10

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 12, 1932

Docket2 Div. 488.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 So. 119 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. State, 139 So. 119, 24 Ala. App. 580, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 10 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was indicted under two counts. The first count charged him with making, manufacturing, or distilling alcoholic or spirituous liquors, etc.; and the second count with the possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose. There was a general verdict of guilt, and judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered. The court imposed an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary as the law provides. From said judgment this appeal was taken and is here submitted upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the motion for a new trial cannot be considered.

No error appears on the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was indicted under two counts. The first count charged him with making, manufacturing, or distilling alcoholic or spirituous liquors, etc.; and the second count with the possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose. There was a general verdict of guilt, and judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered. The court imposed an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary as the law provides. From said judgment this appeal was taken and is here submitted upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the motion for a new trial cannot be considered.

No error appears on the record.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 119, 24 Ala. App. 580, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-alactapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack