Harris v. State
138 So. 424, 24 Ala. App. 558, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 161
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 59 →
Opinion
The evidence for the state tends to prove that the defendant was present at a whisky still at a time when it was raided by the officers and nothing more. There is no evidence connecting this defendant with this still or its operation. The defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge. Smith v. State, 22 Ala. App. 478, 117 So. 3.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 138 So. 424, 24 Ala. App. 558, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 161 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
138 So. 424 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
117 So. 3 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)