Harris v. State
99 So. 925, 19 Ala. App. 682
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Ala. App. 484 →
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on
a charge of unlawfully possessing a still, and appeals. There are no exceptions of merit presented in this record. There was a question as to the sufficiency of the record, hut that has been corrected by a return to the certiorari issued by this court. The evidence was sufficient to convict. The jury so found. The record as corrected contains no prejudicial eryor. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 99 So. 925, 19 Ala. App. 682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).
99 So. 925 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.