Harris v. State

100 Ala. 129
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1893·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

The demurrer to the indictment in this case was manifestly bad, if not frivolous; and the court committed no error in overruling it.

The charge given at the instance of the State was in these words : “Gentlemen of the jury, if you believe the evidence in this case you must find the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment.” This instruction was erroneous in that it authorized and required a conviction though the jury may not have believed the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Pierson v. State, 99 Ala. 148. Heath v. State, Ib. 179.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 100 Ala. 129 (Ala. 1893).

100 Ala. 129 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parker v. State
282 So. 2d 321 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Bolan v. State
34 So. 2d 30 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1948)
Warren v. State
72 So. 624 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
People v. Nussbaum
32 N.Y. Crim. 158 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1914)
Lewis v. State
140 Ala. 126 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1903)
Townsend v. State
137 Ala. 91 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1902)