Harris v. Spader

City of New York Municipal Court

Harris v. Spader

2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 147

DecidedMay 15, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 147 (Harris v. Spader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Spader, 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 147 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

McAdam, Ch. J.

Every pleading or notice must be subscribed by the attorney of record (Code, § 421), and to make a substitution effective, an order should be entered and notice given (Bliss Code, vol. 1, p. 89, note,/). Where a notice of appearance is served by an individual, as attorney for the defendant, and a notice of motion is subsequently served in a firm name, without first entering an order of substitution, the notice is irregular, and the objection to it on that ground is fatal.

Motion dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAdam, Ch. J.

Every pleading or notice must be subscribed by the attorney of record (Code, § 421), and to make a substitution effective, an order should be entered and notice given (Bliss Code, vol. 1, p. 89, note,/). Where a notice of appearance is served by an individual, as attorney for the defendant, and a notice of motion is subsequently served in a firm name, without first entering an order of substitution, the notice is irregular, and the objection to it on that ground is fatal.

Motion dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-spader-nynyccityct-1885.