Harris v. Soules
416 So. 2d 1186, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20414
Opinion
The trial court properly found that appellant failed to adduce competent evidence of a boundary dispute or uncertainty by the parties or their predecessors which was resolved by establishing a boundary through agreement or acquiescence. See King v. Carden, 237 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). The order granting judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. Soules, 416 So. 2d 1186, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20414 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
416 So. 2d 1186 (Harris v. Soules) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vida Appliances, Inc. v. Gates
416 So. 2d 1186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)