Harris v. Soules
416 So. 2d 1186, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20414
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 1982
DocketNo. AG-429
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 416 So. 2d 1186 (Harris v. Soules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. Soules, 416 So. 2d 1186, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20414 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
Opinion
The trial court properly found that appellant failed to adduce competent evidence of a boundary dispute or uncertainty by the parties or their predecessors which was resolved by establishing a boundary through agreement or acquiescence. See King v. Carden, 237 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). The order granting judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vida Appliances, Inc. v. Gates
416 So. 2d 1186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
416 So. 2d 1186, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-soules-fladistctapp-1982.