Harris v. Smith

121 So. 2d 747, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 790
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 20, 1960
DocketNo. 21269
StatusPublished

This text of 121 So. 2d 747 (Harris v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Smith, 121 So. 2d 747, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 790 (La. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

CHARLES J. RIVET, Judge ad hoc.

Charles W. Harris instituted this action on May 7, 1957, claiming to be the record owner of two lots in the Second District of New Orleans, by a chain of title running back to a public sale made in 1911. Pie im-pleaded Robert E. Smith as alleged claimant of the lots, and prayed for judgment against him, the City of New Orleans, and the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, confirming and quieting his title, recognizing him as sole owner of the two lots and prohibiting all defendants from claiming any title or rights to any part of said lots.

Plaintiff makes no allegation as to possession by anyone.

In his petition he gives the following two descriptions of the lots:

“Two certain lots of ground, together with all improvements etc., situated in the Second District of this City in Square 876 (formerly part of Square No. 401) bounded by Anthony St. (now Argonne), St. Peter (now Gen. Haig) and Mason (now Kenilworth) Streets and Taylor (now Florida Ave.) Avenue, designated by the numbers 1 and 2 on plan by Elbert G. Sandoz, C. E. & S., on April 18, 1928. Said lots adjoin each other, and Lot 1 measures 32 feet 8 inches on the Southerly line of the [749]*749right of way on the N. O. T. Company’s RR a frontage of 5 feet 7 inches on Taylor Avenue, a depth on the line of Lot 2 of 105 feet, 7 inches 2 lines and a width in the rear (and on the line of what is said to have been Shell Road) of 36 feet 3 inches. Lot 2 measures 31 feet 7 inches and 2 lines front on Taylor Avenue and has a depth of 105 feet 7 inches between equal and parallel lines.
“The said property was acquired by his vendor under the following descriptions :
“Two certain lots of ground, situated in the Second District of this City in Square No. 876 bounded by Taylor Avenue, Shell Road, Anthony and St. Peter Streets, designated by the numbers 1 and 2. Lot No. 1 measures about 38 feet 3 inches on the right of way of the New Orleans Terminal Company Railroad, 36 feet 3 inches on the Shell Road, 94 feet 2 inches 4 lines on Anthony Street and 105 feet 7 inches 2 lines on the other side line. Lot No. 2 measures 31 feet and 7 inches on Taylor Avenue by 105 feet 7 inches in depth between parallel lines.”

By agreement of counsel and consent of the Court, the City of New Orleans was ■dismissed below, on exceptions.

The Sewerage and Water Board of New ■Orleans pleaded a continuous and apparent servitude over the lots resulting from the location thereon for more than thirty years of sewerage, water, and drainage facilities, which all parties concede.

Defendant Smith resisted plaintiff’s demands, denied plaintiff’s ownership, and alleged that he, the City of New Orleans, and the New Orleans Terminal Company are ■sole owners of the property described in ■plaintiff’s petition, by virtue of a purchase in 1945 from New Orleans Land Company of seven lots (numbered 13 to 19, both inclusive), in Square 401, Second District, New Orleans, composed of ten lots (Nos. 3 to 12, both inclusive) in old Square 876, Second District, New Orleans. He alleged that part of the lots claimed by plaintiff are part of lots 14 and 15 of Square 401, of which he has had actual, open, peaceful, public, notorious and legal possession since his acquisition thereof in 1945 for value and in good faith and pleaded the acquisitive prescription of ten years.

Smith further alleged that part of the property claimed by plaintiff has formed part of two public streets for more than thirty years; and that other parts of said two lots are owned by New Orleans Terminal Company as part of the latter’s right of way existing for more than seventy-five years. He called his vendor, New Orleans Land Company in warranty, to protect his title, or in the event of his eviction to pay him $7500.

New Orleans Land Company appeared in answer to the call in warranty, adopted all pleas and defenses set up by Smith; admitted its sale to the latter and pleaded prescriptions of ten, twenty and thirty years under its own title and that of its vendee. It denied that the value of the property in controversy exceeded $500.

By special plea Smith adopted the pre-. scriptions of twenty and thirty years pleaded by his warrantor.

The trial judge rendered judgment confirming and quieting the plaintiff’s title, recognizing him as sole owner of the whole of the two lots as described with reference to the Sandoz plan, subject only to the servitude of the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans (fully described in the judgment). The judgment further enjoined Smith from claiming or setting up any right, title or interest to any part of the two lots as described and awarded Smith $370 against his warrantor.

Appeals were perfected by New Orleans Land Company from the judgment in favor of Harris and against it in favor of Smith, and by Smith, as to the judgment in favor of Harris. It is conceded by all parties that the judgment in favor of the Sew[750]*750erage and Water Board of New Orleans is correct.

The record discloses that the plaintiff and the defendant, Smith, trace their respective titles to the same public sale made pursuant to a judgment of partition in the matter of Buegnot v. Wogan.

Records of the Conveyance Office for the Parish of Orleans show that among other lots the auctioneer offered for sale lots 1 to 12, inclusive, in Square 876 of the Second District of New Orleans, hounded by Taylor Avenue, Shell Road, Anthony and St. Peter Streets, of which lots 3 to 12, inclusive, were adjudicated to New Orleans Land Company, and lots 1 and 2 to National Realty Company. The proces verbal of the auctioneer recites that the general dimensions and outlines of the property are in accordance with a plan by Chas. Del I’sle, Surveyor, dated February 3, 1862. This plan is not in evidence, and the parties admit that it cannot be found. In the proces verbal of adjudication the lots are described as hav- ■ ing the following measurements:

Lot 1, about 38 feet 3 inches front on the right of way of the N. O. Terminal Co. R. R., 36 feet 3 inches on the Shell Road, 94 feet 2 inches and 4 lines on Anthony Street and 105 feet 7 inches and 2 lines on the side line of lot 2.

Lot 2, 31 feet 7 inches front on Taylor Avenue by a depth of 105 feet 7 inches and 2 lines between parallel lines.

Lot 3 to 11, inclusive, each 31 feet 3 inches on Taylor Avenue by a depth of 105 feet 7 inches and 2 lines between parallel lines.

Lot 12, forming the corner of Taylor Avenue and St. Peter Street, 31 feet and 7 inches on Taylor Avenue by a depth of 105 feet 7 inches 2 lines between parallel lines.

On April 6, 1938, National Realty Company sold lots 1 and 2 to Dr. Oser, and on December 31, 1938, the latter sold to the plaintiff, both conveyances being duly recorded and both containing the double description as quoted supra from plaintiff’s petition.

In 1945 defendant Smith acquired from New Orleans Land Company, by recorded deed, 7 lots in Square 401, Second District, bounded by Florida Avenue (formerly Taylor Ave.) Kenilworth (formerly Scott), General Haig (formerly St. Peter) and Argonne (formerly St. Anthony) Streets, said lots designated by the Nos. 13 to 19, inclusive, on a plan of Lakeview by J. F. Coleman, Civil Engineer, dated February 19, 1938. The deed recites that the lots conveyed are composed of a portion of the ten lots in old Square 876 designated by the Nos.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doll v. Dearie
41 So. 2d 84 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1949)
Duffourc v. Constantin
181 So. 183 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)
Talbot v. Pittman
114 So. 2d 117 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1959)
McHugh v. Albert Hanson Lumber Co.
56 So. 630 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1911)
Carbajal v. Leopold Weil Building & Improvement Co.
83 So. 645 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 So. 2d 747, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-smith-lactapp-1960.