Harris v. Siegelman

700 F. Supp. 1083, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13357, 1988 WL 127167
District Court, M.D. Alabama·Decided September 7, 1988·No. Civ. A. 84-T-595-N·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER AND INJUNCTION

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

On July 19, 1985, this court entered an order in this case requiring that all but two of Alabama’s 67 county “appointing authorities” appoint more black persons as poll officials. Harris v. Graddick, 615 F.Supp. 239 (M.D.Ala.1985). Compliance with the order was assured by mandatory, detailed record-keeping and the opportunity for renewed judicial scrutiny if necessary. Id., at 244-49. Three years later, on June 30, 1988, the court issued a memorandum opinion in which the court found that “the State of Alabama has over the last 100 years adopted and enforced, first, a policy of appointing only white poll officials and, second, a policy of keeping the electoral process closed to black citizens by law and through the use of fraud, force, and intimidation.” Harris v. Siegelman, 695 F.Supp. 517, 529 (M.D.Ala.1988). The court also found that the state retains on its law books today two racially-inspired statutory provisions, codified in 1975 Code of Alabama § 17-8-29, that (a) require a voter seeking assistance to swear an oath that he or she is unable to write the English language, and (b) limit to five minutes the time that a voter may remain inside the voting booth. Id., at 525. The court then concluded that “these policies and law continue today to have substantial adverse effects on the black citizens of this state.” Id. In the order which accompanied the 1988 memorandum opinion, the court required that the plaintiffs and the Governor and Attorney General of the State of Alabama submit to the court proposals which would completely eradicate any and all continuing adverse effects resulting from those state policies and law condemned by the court. Id., at 530.

This lawsuit is again before the court, this time on the plaintiffs’ motion for enforcement, in which the plaintiffs complain that very few county appointing authorities have complied with the 1985 order. Also before the court is the issue of relief under the 1988 order. In resolution of all of these remaining matters, the court enters the following injunction.

It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court:

(1) That the plaintiffs’ motion for enforcement, filed April 24, 1987, be and it is hereby granted as hereinafter set forth; and

(2) That the State of Alabama, its Governor, its Attorney General, and its Secretary of State be and they are each hereby ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from failing to do the following: 1

(A) Mailouts: The State of Alabama, through the Secretary of State with the advice and consent of the Governor and Attorney General, shall prepare and mail a letter, strongly emphasizing the need for full and immediate compliance with all orders in this lawsuit, to all probate judges, sheriffs, circuits clerks, county commissions, chairpersons of county and state Democratic and Republican party executive committees, and district attorneys within the state. The letter shall include:

(i) Copies of this order and of the court’s orders of June 30, 1988, and July 19, 1985;
(ii) A reminder that, prior to the November 1988 elections, each county must be in compliance, and report such compliance, with all orders of this court, including those of July 19, 1985, and June 30, 1988; and
(iii) A warning that, in accordance with prior court orders, future attorney fees *1086 incurred due to noncompliance may be borne by noncomplying counties.

The State of Alabama, through the Secretary of State, shall also send a copy of this letter to major local newspapers — at least one per county.

Additionally, the State of Alabama, through the Secretary of State, with the advice and consent of the Governor and Attorney General, shall provide to municipal mayors and clerks a copy of this order and of the court’s order of June 30, 1988. Moreover, the State of Alabama shall notify municipal mayors and clerks that the provisions of this injunction are applicable to all future municipal elections, but that only sections (E) and (F) of the injunction shall be applicable to the municipal run-off elections of September 13, 1988. The Secretary of State, with the advice and consent of the Governor and Attorney General, shall include, with the copies of this court’s orders, an explanatory letter (1) advising municipal election officials that he is enjoined to inform them of the court’s orders and (2) recommending to them methods of implementing sections (E) and (F) of this order. Municipal election officials may, only during the September 13, 1988 election, improvise in implementing section (E) and use current forms to carry out the intent of that section.

(B) Compliance Reports: The State of Alabama, through the Secretary of State with the advice and consent of the Governor and Attorney General, shall provide a one-time compliance check of the court’s order of July 19, 1985. Completed compliance reports, similar to those used previously in this litigation, shall be sent to the Secretary of State by each appointing authority (consisting of the county’s probate judge, circuit clerk and sheriff) three weeks prior to the November 1988 election. The State of Alabama, through the Secretary of State, will report the results to the Governor, the Attorney General, the plaintiffs, and the court at least five days prior to the November 1988 election. The plaintiffs may move for contempt against any noncomplying entity.

(C) Education: The State of Alabama, through the Secretary of State with the advice and consent of the Governor and Attorney General and in consultation with the plaintiffs, shall develop certification standards and an ongoing training program to train and certify a biracial corps of persons who shall conduct workshops in each county for poll officials in that county. The State of Alabama shall present such plan to the court for approval upon its development.

The primary focus of the training shall be to help poll officials understand all federal and state laws governing elections, including changes in the law brought about as a result of this lawsuit. Additionally, attendees shall be trained in such areas as the proper preparation and return of election documents and the development of appropriate attitudes and skills necessary to handling election-day problems promptly and effectively.

Training and certification sessions, as well as county workshops, shall be open to the public for observation and comment. Poll officials, community leaders, city clerks and managers, mayors, probate judges, sheriffs, circuit clerks, and interested citizens shall be encouraged to attend. The Secretary of State shall publicize such training sessions and workshops by means of news releases and notices to churches and community organizations, and, in particular, to predominantly black ones. The State of Alabama, through the Secretary of State, shall submit to the court, for its approval, a summary of the efforts the State intends to take to provide the required publication. The first series of training and certification sessions and county workshops shall be held prior to the November 1988 elections.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Siegelman, 700 F. Supp. 1083, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13357, 1988 WL 127167 (M.D. Ala. 1988).

700 F. Supp. 1083 (Harris v. Siegelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related