Harris v. Santucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harris v. Santucci

150 A.D.2d 778, 542 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 150 A.D.2d 778 (Harris v. Santucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Santucci, 150 A.D.2d 778, 542 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent from prosecuting the petitioner with respect to Queens County Indictment No. 8052/87 on the ground that the Grand Jury was without jurisdiction to hand down the subject indictment.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

On December 2, 1988, the defendant was convicted in Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), pursuant to the subject indictment, of the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (seven counts) and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree. Relief pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition does not lie in the instant situation inasmuch as the remedy of direct appeal from the judgment of conviction is available (see, Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 NY2d 731; Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent from prosecuting the petitioner with respect to Queens County Indictment No. 8052/87 on the ground that the Grand Jury was without jurisdiction to hand down the subject indictment.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

On December 2, 1988, the defendant was convicted in Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), pursuant to the subject indictment, of the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (seven counts) and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree. Relief pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition does not lie in the instant situation inasmuch as the remedy of direct appeal from the judgment of conviction is available (see, Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 NY2d 731; Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 A.D.2d 778, 542 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-santucci-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack