Harris v. Ross
439 U.S. 1001, 99 S. Ct. 607
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 4, 1978·No. No. 76-1234; No. 76-1261·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
C. A. 4th Cir.; and
C. A. 9th Cir. [Cer-tiorari granted, 431 U. S. 928.] Motion of the Solicitor General, with consent of respondents, for reference to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland [in No. 76-1234], and for reference to the United States District Court for the Central District of California [in No. 76-1261], to consider settlement granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. Ross, 439 U.S. 1001, 99 S. Ct. 607 (1978).
439 U.S. 1001 (Harris v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Underwood v. Pierce
761 F.2d 1342 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Eugene T. Markgraf and Nancy J. Markgraf
736 F.2d 1179 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
John and Dolores Rank v. Robert P. Nimmo, Administrator of the Veterans Administration, John and Dolores Rank v. Robert P. Nimmo, Administrator of the Veterans Administration, and the Kissell Company, an Ohio Corporation
677 F.2d 692 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Underwood v. Pierce
547 F. Supp. 256 (C.D. California, 1982)
Rank v. Nimmo
677 F.2d 692 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Russell v. Landrieu
621 F.2d 1037 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Dubose v. Harris
82 F.R.D. 582 (D. Connecticut, 1979)