Harris v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harris v. Rogers

190 A.D. 965

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1920·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In view of the fact that the complaint was dismissed as to the defendant Rogers and none of the money collected by the plaintiff was contributed by him, we concluded to review the judgment as to him, and reached the conclusion that as to him it should be affirmed. Furthermore, - the defendant Rogers has stipulated to withdraw his motion to dismiss the appeal. Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

In view of the fact that the complaint was dismissed as to the defendant Rogers and none of the money collected by the plaintiff was contributed by him, we concluded to review the judgment as to him, and reached the conclusion that as to him it should be affirmed. Furthermore, - the defendant Rogers has stipulated to withdraw his motion to dismiss the appeal. Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.

Harris v. Rogers, 190 A.D. 965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

190 A.D. 965 (Harris v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related