Harris v. Reinhard
30 A. 510, 165 Pa. 36, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 924
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 12, 1894·No. Appeal, No. 237·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We think the learned court below was entirely correct in opening the judgment as to Sarah A. Reinhard and letting her [37]*37into a defence. When the facts are fully developed on the trial the merits of the controversy can be intelligently considered.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. Reinhard, 30 A. 510, 165 Pa. 36, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 924 (Pa. 1894).
30 A. 510 (Harris v. Reinhard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Land Bank v. . Garman
18 S.E.2d 182 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. Garman
220 N.C. 585 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Dennis v. Grove
4 Pa. Super. 480 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)