Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

Second Circuit

Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

110 F. App'x 185

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 6, 2004

DocketNo. 03-7822

StatusPublished

This text of 110 F. App'x 185 (Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance, 110 F. App'x 185 (2d Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendants appeal from a final judgment following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee.

Defendants raise a number of challenges to the District Court’s jury instructions and evidentiary rulings, as well as its ruling denying defendants’ Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law. We hold that none of these challenges rise to the level of reversible error.

We have considered all of defendants’ claims on appeal and found them to be without merit. We hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendants appeal from a final judgment following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee.

Defendants raise a number of challenges to the District Court’s jury instructions and evidentiary rulings, as well as its ruling denying defendants’ Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law. We hold that none of these challenges rise to the level of reversible error.

We have considered all of defendants’ claims on appeal and found them to be without merit. We hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 F. App'x 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-provident-life-accident-insurance-ca2-2004.