Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

110 F. App'x 185
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 310 F.3d 73
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 6, 2004·No. No. 03-7822·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendants appeal from a final judgment following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee.

Defendants raise a number of challenges to the District Court’s jury instructions and evidentiary rulings, as well as its ruling denying defendants’ Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law. We hold that none of these challenges rise to the level of reversible error.

We have considered all of defendants’ claims on appeal and found them to be without merit. We hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance, 110 F. App'x 185 (2d Cir. 2004).

110 F. App'x 185 (Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.