Harris v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

156 A.3d 261, 638 Pa. 444, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 81
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 17, 2017·No. No. 57 MAP 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2017, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. Appellant’s Motion requesting appointment of counsel or appointment of law student to assist is DENIED. Appellant’s Motion Requesting Nunc Pro Tunc and Letter in Application are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 156 A.3d 261, 638 Pa. 444, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 81 (Pa. 2017).

156 A.3d 261 (Harris v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.