Harris v. Peel

17 La. Ann. 140

Opinion

Jones, J.

The plaintiff, as the holder of a mortgage note, sued out a writ of seizure and sale as to the mortgaged property.

His proceedings are regular; and, upon the examination of the record, we find no error prejudicial to the appellant.

This appeal was taken for delay; but, as the note, the basis of the seizure, bears eight per cent, interest, we simply affirm the judgment, with costs.

Howele, J., recused.