Harris v. Peel
17 La. Ann. 140
This text of 17 La. Ann. 140 (Harris v. Peel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. Peel, 17 La. Ann. 140 (La. 1865).
Opinion
The plaintiff, as the holder of a mortgage note, sued out a writ of seizure and sale as to the mortgaged property.
His proceedings are regular; and, upon the examination of the record, we find no error prejudicial to the appellant.
This appeal was taken for delay; but, as the note, the basis of the seizure, bears eight per cent, interest, we simply affirm the judgment, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hicks v. Bell
1 La. App. 563 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 La. Ann. 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-peel-la-1865.