Harris v. Paterno

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Harris v. Paterno

627 A.2d 1125, 133 N.J. 412, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 128

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 4, 1993·Published

Opinions

ORDER

The Court having granted leave to appeal to consider the Law Division’s denial of plaintiffs motion for a protective order with respect to disclosure of the address and telephone number of a witness;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that leave to appeal is hereby vacated as improvidently granted.

Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, and GARIBALDI join in this Order.

Justices O’HERN and STEIN have filed a separate concurring opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having granted leave to appeal to consider the Law Division’s denial of plaintiffs motion for a protective order with respect to disclosure of the address and telephone number of a witness;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that leave to appeal is hereby vacated as improvidently granted.

Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, and GARIBALDI join in this Order.

Justices O’HERN and STEIN have filed a separate concurring opinion.

Harris v. Paterno, 627 A.2d 1125, 133 N.J. 412, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 128 (N.J. 1993).

Pincite

627 A.2d 1125 (Harris v. Paterno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.